![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Register | Search | Mark Forums Read | Calculators | Contact | Articles | CF Project Vehicles |
|
|
|||||||
| Support the CF Sponsors! - Click here to see all our sponsors | |||
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Car Enthusiast
CF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tampa, Florida>>>>>T-Town BaBy
Posts: 15
|
__________________
Ruff RideR- Fast Cash Racing-J.W. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Car Enthusiast
CF Member
|
I say rebuild the engine, just a suggestion before doing the turbo.  Eclipses  dont have great reliability with turbos and i have heard the same thing but as usual tuner would be best choice tell them what u want and they will tell you how to start.
__________________
slow Jeep |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Car Enthusiast
CF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tampa, Florida>>>>>T-Town BaBy
Posts: 15
|
well....i have rebuilt the engine 3 times. thats why i have high compression pistons now. i do know in order to get turbo you need low compression pistons... but i looked at them and it just seems to me that the piston arm will snap like a twigg. and who is turner? or what? and which is faster for the eclipse nos or turbo. will nos beat a turbo?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Car Fanatic
CF Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Reseda, CA
Posts: 209
|
NOS will beat turbo pound for pound, but not as efficent and effective for the street use, gotta keep buying NOS, O2 in air is freeeeeee.  Plus NOS can be damaging to an engines internals, as can turbos but you have more of a safety net with a turbo.
__________________
As Einstein proved, the faster you go, the longer you live. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
It all depends...I have both on my eclipse. Which I built myself. It all starts with the bottom end. Depending on how much boost you want to run and what kinda shot of nitrous you wish to use. I have a forged crank, H-beam connecting rods, 8.5:1 compression. As far as rings are concerned, it has to do with how much space you set them at intially, which you set according to how you plan to use the engine..N/A, turbo, supercharger, etc. Gereral rule of thumb for forced air it right around .007" for every inch of bore, which N/A is around .003" for every inch of bore, which is why people burn up the rings on thier stock set-up. Im only running 8psi of boost with 10psi at max output right around 7400 rpm. I also run a 75 dual stage N2O kit from Zex. Not that much, but enough to prove my point when I need to. I have right around 380+ hp with this set up. But I also have ALOT of head work done to it, cam, valves, valve springs, thermal coated intake, ice intercooler, 26lb injectors, computer, etc...so it all depends on how far you want to go with it, but no matter what..it starts with your bottom end
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Car Fanatic
CF Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UofL
Posts: 2,717
|
wow...i meen wow!  what you run in the 1/4??
__________________
Old school pushrod 500 cubic inch Hemi V8, Supercharged, Nitromethane and alchohol injected, full on race motor making 7000 HP trying to take a hard left to right chicane and two tight hairpins ... You do the math! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Car Fanatic
CF Senior Member
|
you mean RAN i belive a tree fell on this "Green Machine"  
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Car Fanatic
CF Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UofL
Posts: 2,717
|
you seem to be one of the few people in the wold left with good taste.  very sweet ride
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Car Fanatic
CF Senior Member
|
Too bad it doesnt exsist anymore. :'(
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Car Fanatic
CF Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UofL
Posts: 2,717
|
LOL, no one but me posts pics with them with the car. i meen, how do we know you really had or have that car?? hmm....
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|