![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Register | Search | Mark Forums Read | Calculators | Contact | Articles | CF Project Vehicles |
|
|
|||||||
| Support the CF Sponsors! - Click here to see all our sponsors | |||
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Mayor of CF CF Admin
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 25,153
Vehicle Profile:
Year: 1993
Make: Mazda
Model: RX-7
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Ferrari/GMC Lover
CF Senior Member
|
Good Job BMW but you haven't created an engine better than th LS2 V8
__________________
Quote:
Ford F-Series
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
______________
CF Admin
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,509
Vehicle Profile:
Year: 2006
Make: Ford
Model: F-150 FX4
|
Impressive output for sure....
__________________
Forum Rules | Member Map | Member Garage | Car Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I AM THE LAW
IvD Warrior
|
Really? How do you figure. I'm just saying, 306 HP out of a 3.0 twin-turbo is not exactly setting any records. Toyota made 320 HP 15 years ago with the Supra 3.0 twin-turbo. As did Mitsubishi and Nissan. All running 3.0 twin turbos. I can't seem to think why they would do that, the engine HAS to have way more potential than that. I'm not bagging on it, I'm just a little surprised and dissapointed at the output.
Cyco
__________________
Stick to the facts, keep the personal attacks out, state your opinion, and make a point. Posts just meant to flame other members will be deleted. Posts that do not make a point will be deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Phallic Symbol
CF Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 625
Vehicle Profile:
Year: 2007
Make: Volkswagen
Model: GTI
|
So they've abandoned plans to call the E96 coupe the 4-Series?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Flawless
CF Senior Member
|
LOL@this discussion. This is no HP/Liter debate, but the BMW inlines are known for their inpeccable smooth run and wide torque band. With this twin-turbo low pressure set-up they probably made another award winning engine.
Obviously they didn't went for an all out performance engine. BMW got 360hp out of an 3.2L straight 6 in their M3 CSL. That's 111 hp/liter, from an older engine. LOL@comparing it to twin-turbo high pressure engines in some random japanese sports cars. 306hp in a sportive yet comfortable sedan is impressive, and more than enough. Different sorts for different applications.... BMW has shown e.g. with the V10 in the M5 how to built a real performance engine. hi55us STFU
__________________
![]() Some of my automotive photoshop work |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
pro-liberty
CF Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Mayor of CF CF Admin
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 25,153
Vehicle Profile:
Year: 1993
Make: Mazda
Model: RX-7
|
I'm sure if they wanted to this motor could push a lot more HP / TQ than it is right now, but that isn't their goal with the setup. I think it is a great setup for BMW enthusiasts who may want to play with it later on. But for the person who just buys one for a smooth fun ride, hats off to BMW for the motor how it sits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
CF's Pimp
CF Senior Member
|
What kind of powerband does this engine have? not peaky? really who gives a ****, you can get a better engine from GM cheaper and probably make more power while being smooth and running low octane fuel..
__________________
CF's 2nd Biggest E-Penis What you know about that? I know all about that |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
CF's Pimp
CF Senior Member
|
oh yeah, HP/litre is for ricers.
|
|
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|