Ok i was thinkign abour buying a 1997 cavalier and wat i want to kno is what is better a supercharger or a turbocharger?

can i put both ont he same engine?

Where can i find the cheapest turbo/supercharger?

the engine is a 2.2L ecotec

None of the above. Save your money and get a new Turbo Cobalt SS. Not only will it be faster in a straight line, it'll do this thing called "handle" too.

and won't be as much of a death trap

I agree. However, if you decide not to...TURBOS FTMFW!!!

i light both. but pretty soon i might put the ss ecotech on my geo. lol and one of my co-work said the same on his cav.http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif

i light both. but pretty soon i might put the ss ecotech on my geo. lol and one of my co-work said the same on his cav.http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif

Easy end to the convo...

You're either not serious, or should never drive a car. Pick one.

why you never saw a geo with ss or turbo in it. It just on my to do list 4 my car

swap engine
add a body kit
and a music system

why you never saw a geo with ss or turbo in it. It just on my to do list 4 my car

swap engine
add a body kit
and a music system
drive off bridge

fixed

lol dont hate.. just wait and see. i am going to do the impossible.

lol dont hate.. just wait and see. i am going to do the impossible.

You do that. :rolleyes:

why you never saw a geo with ss or turbo in it. It just on my to do list 4 my car

swap engine
add a body kit
and a music system

Sure I have... rip the ss badge off of a camaro, or take the turbo sticker off of your friend's accord.

its not that you plan on doin the impossible... its that your gonna waste your money and time on the impossible... why fool with a geo? save the money and put it to good use...

its not that you plan on doin the impossible... its that your gonna waste your money and time on the impossible... why fool with a geo? save the money and put it to good use...

Don't bother with logic... it's just a joke.

i kno... just felt like givin someone a hard time...

well if u got money to spend like that would you do it too. Well not to a prism, like a metro, swift, or any other small piece of shit car, will you do it too.

on my pass days, had a civic with turbo, and a mr2 too. now i want to try it to a geo to see what happen and i am not the only one that doing it where i work the lady brought her metro in and had size 18 rim on them. it just something i want to try lol.



http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif

well if u got money to spend like that would you do it too. Well not to a prism, like a metro, swift, or any other small piece of shit car, will you do it too. :headscrat No, because you would save a lot of money and time building something worth while. If you wanna do a swap, LS1 swaps in pretty much any RWD imports are popular and fairly cheap.

on my pass days, had a civic with turbo, and a mr2 too. now i want to try it to a geo to see what happen and i am not the only one that doing it where i work the lady brought her metro in and had size 18 rim on them. it just something i want to try lol.
18's on a metro.. I hate when people do stupid crap like that :shakehead

i wouldnt either but i always say to every man his own.... if i had the money id spend it on gettin my truck perfected and any left over would be gas or put into buyin a more fuel efficient car...

and a mr2 too.

Mark 1, 2, or 3? Turbo, supercharger, or naturally aspirated stock? What width tires did you use on all four corners? What suspension did you use? If it was the N/A version stock, what turbo did you add? Or better yet, which kit did you use?

:biggrin: Nobody say a word, I want this kid to dig his own grave here.

Srsly, MR2's not a POS, it has two merits. One: Mid-engine. Two: Rear wheel drive. The other cars you listed are FF, which sucks, and is not worth even two cents in modification.

But whatever, you CLEARLY know what you're doing. :rolleyes: The only way a metro is any good is if you were to rip out the rear seats, put in a full cage, put a GM L36 V6 in place of the back seat, power the rear wheels with it, and apply the Cartuning Performance turbo kit to the engine. Beyond that, the metro is ONLY.... absolutely ONLY... an economy car.

Nobody say a word
poop.

poop.
:rotf: I have no idea why that made me laugh as hard as it did, but it did anyway.

He's not saying anything...

He must think we can only see movement... Maybe if he just stands still... we'll go away, and start to like him...

oh yeah, and poop.

lol...good stuff

Mark 1, 2, or 3? Turbo, supercharger, or naturally aspirated stock? What width tires did you use on all four corners? What suspension did you use? If it was the N/A version stock, what turbo did you add? Or better yet, which kit did you use?

:biggrin: Nobody say a word, I want this kid to dig his own grave here.

Srsly, MR2's not a POS, it has two merits. One: Mid-engine. Two: Rear wheel drive. The other cars you listed are FF, which sucks, and is not worth even two cents in modification.

But whatever, you CLEARLY know what you're doing. :rolleyes: The only way a metro is any good is if you were to rip out the rear seats, put in a full cage, put a GM L36 V6 in place of the back seat, power the rear wheels with it, and apply the Cartuning Performance turbo kit to the engine. Beyond that, the metro is ONLY.... absolutely ONLY... an economy car.

the mr2 i had was

99' mr2 spyder.. stock

1.8, 4 cyl, twin-cam..


i think the hp was 135-138

and it a r-w drive (engine is on the back :tongue: ).... anything else you want to know?

any who

i dont like small car that have 18 ether. my geo right now have 15s on them might put 16. http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif

i dont like intelligence.

It all makes sense now.

pwnt.

:ravant:

the mr2 i had was

99' mr2 spyder.. stock
Should have modified it.

1.8, 4 cyl, twin-cam..
:rolleyes:

i think the hp was 135-138
Stock? :rotf: 128 at the crank at best.

and it a r-w drive (engine is on the back :tongue: )
*GASP* No, shit, really?!one! Never would have guessed. Because MR2 means nothing about it being an MR vehicle... :rolleyes:

.... anything else you want to know?
Nope, you've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that you have relatively NO idea what you're talking about when it comes to the modification and improvement of an automobile. Do the metro a favor and never take a wrench to it.

*GASP* No, shit, really?!one! Never would have guessed. Because MR2 means nothing about it being an MR vehicle... :rolleyes:

Holy ****! I never realized that!

I'm not kidding either, I never thought of it that way :rotf:

Ever heard of the Nissan Mid-4? Guess what THAT name meant....LOL

Edit: I just found out the MID4 was a prototype......

Ever heard of the Nissan Mid-4? Guess what THAT name meant....LOL

Bully.

MR, 4-cylinder? At first I was gonna guess a Mid-engine 4-door, but then I realized how fantastically stupid I'd been to even consider that.

Go me! :woot:

Bully.

MR, 4-cylinder? At first I was gonna guess a Mid-engine 4-door, but then I realized how fantastically stupid I'd been to even consider that.

Go me! :woot:


ROFLMMFAO!!!!!!

http://www.zhome.com/History/MID-4.htm

To me, the MID4-II is a nice looking car....and, not it's not Mid engine 4-cyl. It's mid engine AWD. It used the HICAS all wheel steering and ATESSA systems from the Skyline. Would've been a sweet ass car had they made it.

http://www.zhome.com/History/MID-4.htm

To me, the MID4-II is a nice looking car....and, not it's not Mid engine 4-cyl. It's mid engine AWD. It used the HICAS all wheel steering and ATESSA systems from the Skyline. Would've been a sweet ass car had they made it.

Hm, cool. A bit reminiscent of older Ferraris, no?

Yeah. The 1985 one looks decent, but the 87 looks like......a Ferrari and a NSeX got it on pretty heavy.

Holy ****! I never realized that!

I'm not kidding either, I never thought of it that way :rotf:

:rotf:!

http://www.zhome.com/History/MID-4.htm

To me, the MID4-II is a nice looking car....and, not it's not Mid engine 4-cyl. It's mid engine AWD. It used the HICAS all wheel steering and ATESSA systems from the Skyline. Would've been a sweet ass car had they made it.

Not bad, but the AWD would have defeated the purpose of the vehicle. Lightweight, good handling.

Seriously, it was one of those "Oh my ****ing god, how come I never noticed that?" moments that seem to happen to me ever-so-often.

Not bad, but the AWD would have defeated the purpose of the vehicle. Lightweight, good handling.

Meh, that's what's awesome about the ATESSA system, 90/10 rear/front split under accleration. Unless it was a different setup on the MID4.

Meh, that's what's awesome about the ATESSA system, 90/10 rear/front split under accleration. Unless it was a different setup on the MID4.
Yeah, but under lesser load, such as around a turn, where it makes the difference, it's more towards the front, causing the understeer.

Yeah, but under lesser load, such as around a turn, where it makes the difference, it's more towards the front, causing the understeer.

Stop being so smart. You made my brain sweat, LOL

Liez. I can't brain today, I has the dumb. (And drunk.)

Liez. I can't brain today, I has the dumb. (And drunk.)

'Atta boy, so you did fix it?

'Atta boy, so you did fix it?
Sorta. :biggrin:

lol this is getting off topic.. topic was cavlier turbo or superchager.... and lol me putting a ss ecotech engine to a geo prizm and turning it to a chevy prizm..lol

lol this site is too much fun lol.. http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif


edit:

Liez. I can't brain today, I has the dumb. (And drunk.)


WTF :huh? :headscrat :shakehead :huh?

lol this is getting off topic.. topic was cavlier turbo or superchager.... and lol me putting a ss ecotech engine to a geo prizm and turning it to a chevy prizm..lol

lol this site is too much fun lol.. http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif


edit:




WTF :huh? :headscrat :shakehead :huh?
...... :headscrat

lol this is getting off topic.. topic was cavlier turbo or superchager.... and lol me putting a ss ecotech engine to a geo prizm and turning it to a chevy prizm..lol

lol this site is too much fun lol.. http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif


edit:




WTF :huh? :headscrat :shakehead :huh?

Cavalier, none of the above. Get a Cobalt with the turbo stock, and have fun. Already runs an 8:22 at the Nurburgring. Cavalier won't hold a candle to it. We've already stated that. For the cost it would take to bring a Cavy up to par with a Cobalt, it's cheaper to buy the new one. Period.

As for the Geo thing, again... failboat. That is all.

it not that hard to put a ecotech engine to a geo. the prizm is a a cav with a toyota engine lol.... all you need to do is get a engine plus a transmission and change the name to a chevy lol paint it no one can tell it was a geo before lol only the year and vin well tell you lol....



http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif

it not that hard to put a ecotech engine to a geo. the prizm is a a cav with a toyota engine lol.... all you need to do is get a engine plus a transmission and change the name to a chevy lol paint it no one can tell it was a geo before lol only the year and vin well tell you lol....



http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif

:eyeroll: You really have no idea what's involved with an OBD-II swap along with several motor mount, transmission mount, and wiring harness modifications necessary to fit any Ecotec worth its weight into a Geo, do you?

prizm is a corolla

Isn't the prizm a coupe? Or, am I thinking of the Storm?

that's the storm

Oh, cool.

it not that hard to put a ecotech engine to a geo. the prizm is a a cav with a toyota engine lol.... all you need to do is get a engine plus a transmission and change the name to a chevy lol paint it no one can tell it was a geo before lol only the year and vin well tell you lol....



http://www.exodot.com/cs/123.gif

This guy =
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh111/porsche911carrera/EPICFAIL.jpg


That is all.

Yes. Yes, he is an epic FAIL! But, hey, who's counting?